Comments on: Dawkins & I http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/ the republic of tea Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:15:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0 by: tea http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-766 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:35:32 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-766 hvala pek, hvala abaris :) juhu! hvala pek, hvala abaris )
juhu!

]]> by: abaris http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-765 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:50:23 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-765 Tea, očitno sem se motil. Upanje za Slovenijo ŠE obstaja: http://www.modrijan.si/knjigarna/knjiga.php?c=265 He he. ;) Tea, očitno sem se motil. Upanje za Slovenijo ŠE obstaja:

http://www.modrijan.si/knjigarna/knjiga.php?c=265

He he. )

]]> by: pek http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-626 Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:12:32 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-626 Če koga zanima, je Dawkins imel dve zanimivi predavanji na konferenci Beyond belief, kjer so nastopala še številna zveneča imena, za vse readovedne krajši povzetek in linki: origional source: http://www.BeyondBelief2006.org/ Beyond Belief 2006 conference, with speakers like Richard Dawkins, Michael Sherm er, Sam Harris, and many others. Lecture topics include Science, Religion, Evolution, etc. -- Just 40 years after a famous TIME magazine cover asked "Is God Dead?" the answer appears to be a resounding "No!" According to a survey by the Pew Forum on Reli gion & Public Life in a recent issue of Foreign Policy magazine, "God is Winning ". Religions are increasingly a geopolitical force to be reckoned with. Fundamen talist movements - some violent in the extreme - are growing. Science and religi on are at odds in the classrooms and courtrooms. And a return to religious value s is widely touted as an antidote to the alleged decline in public morality. Aft er two centuries, could this be twilight for the Enlightenment project and the b eginning of a new age of unreason? Will faith and dogma trump rational inquiry, or will it be possible to reconcile religious and scientific worldviews? Can evo lutionary biology, anthropology and neuroscience help us to better understand ho w we construct beliefs, and experience empathy, fear and awe? Can science help u s create a new rational narrative as poetic and powerful as those that have trad itionally sustained societies? Can we treat religion as a natural phenomenon? Ca n we be good without God? And if not God, then what? This is a critical moment in the human situation, and The Science Network in ass ociation with the Crick-Jacobs Center brought together an extraordinary group of scientists and philosophers to explore answers to these questions. The conversa tion took place at the Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA from November 5-7, 2006. Sunday, November 5, 2006 Session 1 Steven Weinberg, Lawrence Krauss, Sam Harris, Michael Shermer Session 2 Neil deGrasse Tyson; Discussion: Tyson, Weinberg, Krauss, Harris, Shermer Session 3 Joan Roughgarden, Richard Dawkins, Francisco Ayala, Carolyn Porco Session 4 Stuart Hameroff, V.S. Ramachandran Monday, November 6, 2006 Session 5 Paul Davies, Steven Nadler, Patricia Churchland Session 6 Susan Neiman, Loyal Rue, Elizabeth Loftus Session 7 Mahzarin Banaji, Richard Dawkins, Scott Atran Session 8 Scott Atran, Sir Harold Kroto, Charles Harper, Ann Druyan Tuesday, November 7, 2006 Session 9 Sam Harris, Jim Woodward, Melvin Konner; Discussion: Harris, Woodward, Konner, Dawkins, Paul Churchland Session 10 Richard Sloan, V.S. Ramachandran, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Terry Sejnowski -- also available via: Session 1 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8680343761655636470 Session 2 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=275693092937060684 Session 3 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3964334047741266525 Session 4 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8497674654844217575 Session 5 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6636020940472258071 Session 6 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6288223549248832193 Session 7 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4999158785245212168 Session 8 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2776267329295218309 Session 9 - Beyond Belief 2006 (dela do 1:17): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5682525648026627936 Session 10 - Beyond Belief 2006: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5559355597212327756 Huda imena, res nove znanstvene teorije, zanimivi prispevki... Če koga zanima, je Dawkins imel dve zanimivi predavanji na konferenci Beyond belief, kjer so nastopala še številna zveneča imena, za vse readovedne krajši povzetek in linki:

origional source: http://www.BeyondBelief2006.org/

Beyond Belief 2006 conference, with speakers like Richard Dawkins, Michael Sherm
er, Sam Harris, and many others.

Lecture topics include Science, Religion, Evolution, etc.

–

Just 40 years after a famous TIME magazine cover asked “Is God Dead?” the answer
appears to be a resounding “No!” According to a survey by the Pew Forum on Reli
gion & Public Life in a recent issue of Foreign Policy magazine, “God is Winning
“. Religions are increasingly a geopolitical force to be reckoned with. Fundamen
talist movements - some violent in the extreme - are growing. Science and religi
on are at odds in the classrooms and courtrooms. And a return to religious value
s is widely touted as an antidote to the alleged decline in public morality. Aft
er two centuries, could this be twilight for the Enlightenment project and the b
eginning of a new age of unreason? Will faith and dogma trump rational inquiry,
or will it be possible to reconcile religious and scientific worldviews? Can evo
lutionary biology, anthropology and neuroscience help us to better understand ho
w we construct beliefs, and experience empathy, fear and awe? Can science help u
s create a new rational narrative as poetic and powerful as those that have trad
itionally sustained societies? Can we treat religion as a natural phenomenon? Ca
n we be good without God? And if not God, then what?

This is a critical moment in the human situation, and The Science Network in ass
ociation with the Crick-Jacobs Center brought together an extraordinary group of
scientists and philosophers to explore answers to these questions. The conversa
tion took place at the Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA from November 5-7, 2006.

Sunday, November 5, 2006
Session 1 Steven Weinberg, Lawrence Krauss, Sam Harris, Michael Shermer
Session 2 Neil deGrasse Tyson; Discussion: Tyson, Weinberg, Krauss, Harris, Shermer
Session 3 Joan Roughgarden, Richard Dawkins, Francisco Ayala, Carolyn Porco
Session 4 Stuart Hameroff, V.S. Ramachandran

Monday, November 6, 2006
Session 5 Paul Davies, Steven Nadler, Patricia Churchland
Session 6 Susan Neiman, Loyal Rue, Elizabeth Loftus
Session 7 Mahzarin Banaji, Richard Dawkins, Scott Atran
Session 8 Scott Atran, Sir Harold Kroto, Charles Harper, Ann Druyan

Tuesday, November 7, 2006
Session 9 Sam Harris, Jim Woodward, Melvin Konner; Discussion: Harris, Woodward, Konner, Dawkins, Paul Churchland
Session 10 Richard Sloan, V.S. Ramachandran, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Terry Sejnowski

–

also available via:

Session 1 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8680343761655636470

Session 2 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=275693092937060684

Session 3 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3964334047741266525

Session 4 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8497674654844217575

Session 5 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6636020940472258071

Session 6 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6288223549248832193

Session 7 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4999158785245212168

Session 8 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2776267329295218309

Session 9 - Beyond Belief 2006 (dela do 1:17):
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5682525648026627936

Session 10 - Beyond Belief 2006:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5559355597212327756

Huda imena, res nove znanstvene teorije, zanimivi prispevki…

]]> by: robert79 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-359 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:05:52 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-359 Moram reči, da bi rad srečal in se morda pogovarjal (če bi imel on čas) z Richardom Dawkinson. Bral sem njegove knjige, užival sem npr. ob še neprevedeni <i>Unweaving the Rainbow</i>, všeč mi je, kako zelo je razgledan in kako vpleta razne pesmice, anekdote in citate v rdečo nit, s katero gre daleč... No, poleg tega je velik optimist. Predvsem zato bi ga rad spoznal še v živo. Moram reči, da bi rad srečal in se morda pogovarjal (če bi imel on čas) z Richardom Dawkinson. Bral sem njegove knjige, užival sem npr. ob še neprevedeni Unweaving the Rainbow, všeč mi je, kako zelo je razgledan in kako vpleta razne pesmice, anekdote in citate v rdečo nit, s katero gre daleč… No, poleg tega je velik optimist. Predvsem zato bi ga rad spoznal še v živo.

]]> by: tea http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-344 Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:46:57 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-344 o pa res :O hvala, abaris! :) o pa res :O

hvala, abaris! )

]]> by: abaris http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-321 Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:11:52 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-321 Mislim, da je tole posnetek tega dogodka: http://youtube.com/watch?v=dcXCebPD108 Mislim, da je tole posnetek tega dogodka:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=dcXCebPD108

]]> by: tea http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-313 Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:39:29 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-313 no, prav, kakor hoces :) kar se pa drzave tice... so dosti hujse okrog... recimo ta, v kateri sem pravkar ;) no, prav, kakor hoces )
kar se pa drzave tice… so dosti hujse okrog… recimo ta, v kateri sem pravkar )

]]> by: abaris http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-312 Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:43:47 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-312 Hvala za prijaznost, Tea. Raje ne bom izzival Konzorcija, da mi ne zamerijo. Sicer pa tudi ne gori streha - če bodo držali besedo, po mojih izračunih prejmem knjigo sredi januarja. Lahko pa, da me tudi presenetijo in jo dobim že za "zimski solsticij". :D Dvomim pa, da bomo hitro videli slovenski prevod. To ni ravno Dan Brown. Če sklepamo po tem, koliko so recimo potrebovali za Huntingtona, bom jaz do takrat že v zrelih letih. Kaj čmo, če živimo v takšni državi... Hvala za prijaznost, Tea. Raje ne bom izzival Konzorcija, da mi ne zamerijo. Sicer pa tudi ne gori streha - če bodo držali besedo, po mojih izračunih prejmem knjigo sredi januarja. Lahko pa, da me tudi presenetijo in jo dobim že za “zimski solsticij”. D

Dvomim pa, da bomo hitro videli slovenski prevod. To ni ravno Dan Brown. Če sklepamo po tem, koliko so recimo potrebovali za Huntingtona, bom jaz do takrat že v zrelih letih.

Kaj čmo, če živimo v takšni državi…

]]> by: tea http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-311 Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:36:07 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-311 :( nisem vedela, da je Konzorcij tako nesposoben. mogoce lahko odjavis pri njih in ti vseeno jaz prinesem? :(
nisem vedela, da je Konzorcij tako nesposoben. mogoce lahko odjavis pri njih in ti vseeno jaz prinesem?

]]> by: abaris http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-310 Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:33:26 +0000 http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/28/dawkins-i/#comment-310 Jao, ko bi bil vedel prej. :( Nimam kreditne kartice, pa sem naročil preko Konzorcija. Rekli so da bom moral čakati vsaj 3 mesece. Znoru bom. Jao, ko bi bil vedel prej. (

Nimam kreditne kartice, pa sem naročil preko Konzorcija.

Rekli so da bom moral čakati vsaj 3 mesece. Znoru bom.

]]>