<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God stinks!</title>
	<link>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/</link>
	<description>the republic of tea</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tea</title>
		<link>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-535</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-535</guid>
					<description>tamaris,
I'm not saying this is a good argument for absence of god - i just thought it was funny, which is why i posted it. there are clearly many better reasons to not believe in god.
dawkins builds his theory on scientific base - so, unless you're only refering to this specific argument, you're wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tamaris,<br />
I&#8217;m not saying this is a good argument for absence of god - i just thought it was funny, which is why i posted it. there are clearly many better reasons to not believe in god.<br />
dawkins builds his theory on scientific base - so, unless you&#8217;re only refering to this specific argument, you&#8217;re wrong.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tamaris</title>
		<link>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-531</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-531</guid>
					<description>What is smelliness? The absence of cleaness. There must be a maximum of cleaness and all degrees of smelliness are imperfect variations of cleaness, right to the maximum of smelliness which is total absence of cleaness. Dawkins builds his theory on wrong base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is smelliness? The absence of cleaness. There must be a maximum of cleaness and all degrees of smelliness are imperfect variations of cleaness, right to the maximum of smelliness which is total absence of cleaness. Dawkins builds his theory on wrong base.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Einherjar</title>
		<link>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-260</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-260</guid>
					<description>Ja, ni lepsega, kot poslusati zablode ljudi, da bog obstaja :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ja, ni lepsega, kot poslusati zablode ljudi, da bog obstaja <img src="http://tea.sopca.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=")" class="wp-smiley" />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: domn</title>
		<link>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-258</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-258</guid>
					<description>lol, teh 300 dokazov, en bolši od druzga :D še mal, pa ne bom več budist!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, teh 300 dokazov, en bolši od druzga <img src="http://tea.sopca.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="D" class="wp-smiley" />  še mal, pa ne bom več budist!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: falka</title>
		<link>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-257</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tea.sopca.com/2006/10/17/god-stinks/#comment-257</guid>
					<description>hihihihihi

naj bodi dobro prevedena. potem se je se jas lotim! zdej sm zacela selfiš đin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hihihihihi</p>
<p>naj bodi dobro prevedena. potem se je se jas lotim! zdej sm zacela selfiš đin
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
